Early this month, the head of NATO warned that the fierce battle over the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut could end with a Russian victory within days. Three weeks later, his prediction has yet to come true. Ukraine and Russia are still fighting for control of the city.
The stalemate has come at great cost for both sides, particularly Russia. Ukrainian officials have estimated that for every one of their soldiers lost, Russia has lost seven. Russia tried to replenish its ranks by letting prisoners fight, but it has nearly exhausted the supply of those recruits as well.
The battle has also taken a heavy toll on munitions, vehicles and other military equipment — and has also taken a lot of time. The first time this newsletter mentioned Bakhmut was in July, when Russia increased its attacks near the city.
Russia could still capture Bakhmut, and some analysts expect it to do so. But for now, the battle over the city has become yet another example of Ukraine defying the odds and of Russia performing worse than many experts expected. Today’s newsletter will explain why both sides have put so much into Bakhmut — and why it could have important consequences for the broader war.
Wanting a win
Bakhmut has little strategic value, U.S. officials say. The city is in eastern Ukraine, Russia’s primary target in the war, but there is nothing uniquely valuable about the city for the war effort.
So why has Russia thrown so much into taking it? Because Vladimir Putin, Russia’s president, is desperate for a win — any win. The war has not gone as well for Russia as most people expected. In the past several months, Russia has lost territory, pulling back in both the northeastern and southern fronts. The original goal — to take Kyiv and topple the Ukrainian government — now seems beyond reach.
If Russia can take Bakhmut now, Putin can argue to the Russian people, to his allies in China and Iran and to Western supporters of Ukraine that Russia is making gains and has momentum. A win could boost morale among Russian forces and hurt international support for Ukraine. With the spring expected to bring better weather for renewed offenses, that boost to Russia could help its military get back on track in the war.
Conversely, the perception that a victory in Bakhmut could raise Russian morale and sink Ukrainian hopes has also turned the city into a symbol for Ukraine. Its president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has said that a Russian seizure of Bakhmut would let Putin argue that he has the advantage. “If he will feel some blood — smell that we are weak — he will push, push, push,” Zelensky said this week.
But even if Russia takes Bakhmut, the win might amount to little gain at great cost. Russia will have lost so many troops and so much equipment trying to take a city of scant strategic value that it may have been better off never mounting an offensive.
And a Russian failure to take Bakhmut altogether would be an astonishing defeat. After all, if Russia can’t capture the city even with the investment of so many resources, how can it expect to win the broader war?
“Bakhmut will always be a Pyrrhic victory for Russia. It gets them nothing,” said my colleague Michael Schwirtz, who has covered the war from Ukraine. “But if Ukraine manages to push them back, it will be a disaster.”
What comes next
The battle could also have negative consequences for Ukraine. Its military has put resources toward the fight there that could have gone elsewhere, particularly to an offensive this spring. Ukraine wants to not only retake lost land through a renewed offensive but also split Russian forces in the east from those in the south.
“If a Ukrainian offensive in the weeks ahead comes close but falls short, there will be recriminations about whether such an effort could have been more successful if resources had not been diverted to Bakhmut,” said my colleague Julian Barnes, who covers national security.
But it’s also possible that the battle for Bakhmut could help Ukraine’s next offensive, by having forced Russia to spend so many resources on the city. How the fighting in Bakhmut will be judged, then, depends on what happens next and how the consequences play out on the rest of the battlefield.
More on the war
THE LATEST NEWS
Mexico is investigating the deaths of at least 39 people at a migrant detention center near the U.S. border as a homicide case.
Pope Francis, 86, is in the hospital in Rome, where he is being treated for a respiratory infection.
A fire on a passenger ferry in the Philippines killed at least 28 people.
China spent billions to become a major player in soccer, but the experiment was a flop.
A Chinese billionaire used to have ties to the Chinese Communist Party and Donald Trump’s allies. Now, he’s accused of fraud on two continents.
Other Big Stories
By missing a chance to learn from their opponent, the Stanford students who heckled a conservative judge hurt themselves the most, Pamela Paul says.
Today’s anti-affirmative action lawsuits rest on a false premise: No one is entitled to get into an elite college, no matter their achievements, Serena Puang argues.
Too many prisoners emerge stigmatized and lacking basic skills. California’s rehabilitation experiment aims to change that, Bill Keller writes.
Next week’s Wisconsin Supreme Court election is the most important political contest of 2023, Michelle Goldberg writes.
“Stay away”: An Amsterdam ad campaign tells young British men to pick a different vacation destination.
Advice from Wirecutter: How to avoid bed bugs when traveling.
Lives Lived: Julie Anne Peters published “Luna,” thought to be the first young-adult novel with a transgender character released by a mainstream publisher, in 2004. Peters died at 71.
Happy Opening Day! All 30 Major League Baseball teams will play today. Here are a few stories to get you ready:
On “The Daily,” The Times’s Michael Schmidt explains the plan to save baseball from the tyranny of the home run.
To follow along all season, sign up for The Windup, an Athletic newsletter from Levi Weaver, Ken Rosenthal and others.
Wrong on purpose
At a rehearsal for a new Broadway take on “Peter Pan,” an actor swung wildly around the stage, crashing into the set and screaming. All was going according to plan.
“Peter Pan Goes Wrong,” a slapstick comedy set to open next month, comes from Mischief, a company that specializes in deconstructing theater tropes with the timing of “The Three Stooges.” Mischief’s first show spoofed Agatha Christie.
“I’ve gained a bruise or two in rehearsal,” Greg Tannahill, who plays Pan, told The Times. “But you’ve got to break a few eggs to make a lovely omelet.”
PLAY, WATCH, EAT
What to Cook
The pangram from yesterday’s Spelling Bee was outfoxed. Here is today’s puzzle.
Here’s today’s Mini Crossword, and a clue: Best friend of Charlie Brown (five letters).
And here’s today’s Wordle.
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow.
P.S. How do they play Wordle? The actor Danica McKellar, the novelists Taffy Brodesser-Akner and Sabaa Tahir, as well as Times journalists, narrate their personal approaches.
Here’s today’s front page.
Kitty Bennett, Matthew Cullen, Lauren Hard, Lauren Jackson, Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Ashley Wu contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at [email protected].
Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox.